Fujisan's Kyareng

Friday, February 7, 2020

Chinese ambassador's statement on Tibet misleading and not true!

Chinese flag raised before Potala palace in Lhasa, Tibetg

14th November 2019

Chinese ambassador to India Sun Weidong's article, "China's Tibet: A story of progress" in Hindustsan Times [Nov 6, 2019] is misleading and not true. It is only a reflection of what the Chinese communist leadership would like the world to believe. Xinhua News, the CCP’s mouthpiece, was quick to share the same for global consumption the next day. For the Tibetans, the sixty years of Chinese rule has not been a story of progress, development and religious freedom. On the contrary it has been a sixty long years of repression and occupation. The Ambassador has said, “Tibet has been part of China since ancient time. It enjoys development and progress”! I am surprised at the audacity of China making such statement in India, who knows the best what Tibetans have gone through all these years. Let me clarify and apprise the Ambassador and the Chinese leadership of the following facts:

The 7th century Tibetan Emperor Srongtsan Gampo won the hand of Chinese Tang Princess Wenchen Konjo because of his conquest and valour, and the princess was the fifth queen, not the main queen. Tibetan Buddhism has its source in India not China. Indian saint Padma Sambhava, who brought Buddhism in Tibet, is still revered as the second Buddha in Tibet. Many Indian masters have visited Tibet to teach and many Tibetan masters have travelled to India to receive the teachings. Tibetans Lamas have visited China to teach Buddhism, but there is no record of Chinese Buddhist masters visiting Tibet to teach. Ambassador’s assertion that Buddhism came to Tibet from China is wrong.   
The Yuan dynasty was one of the Mongol dynasties or khanates to rule the eastern part of its territory, Kublai Khan [r. 1260-94 CE] founded it in 1271. Tibet enjoyed a special relationship of Priest-patron [Tib: Chos-yon] with the Mongol under Godan and Kublai Khan well before the establishment of the Yuan dynasty. China came under the Yuan dynasty when Kublai Khan invaded the southern Sung empire in 1279. China was only a part of the conquered territories and not the founder of the Dynasty. Therefore, it is preposterous on the part of China to claim Tibet because of the Mongol conquest. On that ground, Mongolia has a far better reason to claim Tibet and China.

China gained independence from the Mongols in 1368, eighteen years after Tibet and formed the Ming dynasty [1368-1644]. Historical records and maps drawn during the Yuan and the Ming show Tibet as a foreign state. The Yuan empire has twelve major provinces and Tibet was not included as one. This was because Tibet, although under Mongol influence, was ruled by Sakya Lamas since 1253 and not by the Mongols. Chinese territorial map drawn by Chinese legal officer Wang Fen in 1594 during the Ming Dynasty has also excluded Tibet. This goes on to say that Tibet was never considered a part of the Yuan and the Ming Empires.

Regarding the Qing dynasty and the reincarnation issues, first thing that we must understand is that Qing was a Manchu dynasty not Chinese. This Manchu Qing dynasty too came into existence only in 1644, whereas the first Dalai Lama Gedun Drupa was born in 1391. His reincarnation, the second Dalai Lama Gedun Gyatso, came in 1475, and his reincarnation Sonam Gyatso in 1543. The Dalai Lamas’ reincarnation system far precedes the Qing dynasty by 253 years.

In 1792, when Manchu emperor Qianglong [r.1736-1795] helped Tibet drive away the invading Gurkha force, his officials suggested 29-point regulations for effective administration. One of this was the use of golden urn to select the Dalai Lamas and other high Lamas. But except for the 11th Dalai Lama [1838-1856], Tibetans never adopted it because it lacked the religious sanctity. All the Dalai Lamas were selected as per age old Tibetan religious tradition, and the Chinese claim of authority on the reincarnation of the Dalai Lamas is a blatant lie and distortion of historical and religious facts.

In August 2007, China promulgated the so called ‘Order number 5’ to control and undermine the Tibetan religious activities. Under this decree all the incarnate Buddhist Lamas should seek approval of the state before being recognized as reincarnate Lamas. China communist party does not believe in religion, they consider religion as poison. So, it is unethical and ridiculous on the part of CCP to interfere in Tibetan religious matter. Tibetans have rejected this decree as gross violation of their religious freedom. The party members and Tibetans working in the government offices are not allowed to visit Monasteries and Temples, so are the children. Ironically, most of the monasteries are administered by the CCP members under heavy surveillance, and considering the ongoing destruction and repression in Larung-gar and Yachen-gar monasteries, what religious freedom the ambassador is talking about?

Now as far as the GDP growth in Tibet is concerned, the development has not benefitted the Tibetans. The growth figure is reflection of the massive militarization of the Tibetan plateau, investment in mining activities, construction of dams and tunnels, and increased employment and migration of Chinese workers and settlers in Tibet. It has marginalized the Tibetans and plunged Tibet into climate crisis, threatening the ecology of the neighboring south-east Asian countries.

We are all well aware of China’s provocation at the borders from time to time at its convenient time, but the concluding statement on India in the article, “It hopes and believes that India, as a major responsible country, will stick to its position, honor its commitments, resist interference on Tibet-related issues…” is no less a deliberate provocation. China should respect India’s sovereignty and patience. We all need to work together to create a healthy atmosphere to resolve Tibet issue and ensure stable development of Sino-Indian relations.


Friday, November 8, 2019

China was only a part of the Mongol Yuan Dynasty, it was neither the authority nor the inheritor of the dynasty

Abstract: Tibet has been an independent state politically and historically before its invasion by the communist China in 1950. People's Republic of China (PRC) claims Tibet as a part of China on various unfounded historical pretexts, most notably the Yuan Empire [1271-1368 CE], which ruled the eastern part of the Mongol empire. China says that it inherited Tibet from the Yuan dynasty when the Chinese Ming took over in 1368 CE. This paper will examine the relationship between Tibet and Mongol around that time to see if the Chinese claim has any substance in the matter, or is it just a propaganda gimmick to distort historical facts to satisfy their political agenda.

Mongolia was once dominated by various warring nomadic tribes and it was Genghis Khan who put Mongolia in the world map and history through his conquests. The major tribes during the time of Genghis Khan were: the Tartars in the east, the Keraits in the center, the Merkits and Ongut in the north, the Naimans in the west, Olkhunut, Bayud, Khongirad, Kirghiz, Oirats and so forth.[1] Genghis Khan born as Temuchin in 1162, heunited these warring independent tribes and became the Great Khan. He went onto consolidate the largest contiguous empire in world history. Mongol Khanate in Russia and Europe; the Yuan empire in the present day China, Burma and Koreas in the east; Chagatai Khanate in the present day Pakistan, Afghanistan, Kirghizsthan etc.; and Ilkhanate in Persia, the present day Iran, Iraq, Turkey etc. [Map-4 of DIIR, The Mongols and Tibet]
Tibet also came under the Mongol's influence around those times and later developed a close and special relationship with the Mongol and its people. It was not a relationship of the conqueror and the conquered, of the subduer and the subdued. There emanated a unique Priest-patron [Tib: chos-yon] relationship which navigated their political and spiritual pursuits. This relationship was mutually beneficial; for the Tibetans, it gave them full autonomy and protection against any invasion; for the Mongolians, it gave their Emperors legitimacy to rule and its people a profound Buddhist philosophical teachings and moral foundation.   

The Mongols came to the Tibetan border for the first time in 1207 and 1209, when Genghis Khan attacked the Tangut of Hsi Hsia Kingdom[2] in the north of Tibet[3]. Tibet submitted to the Mongols and agreed to pay tribute and thus was spared invasion. But it was only in 1226 that Mongol finally subjugated the Tangut, Genghis Khan died the year after and Tibet stopped paying tribute to the Mongols. A Tibetan text Horchos 'byun, says Tibet submitted to Genghis Khan and the latter adopted Buddhism. Some scholars say this could be erroneous, Tangut is known in Tibet as Mi-nyag and the conquest of Mi-nyag was taken as conquest of Tibet[4]. 
Prince Godan, the second son of Ogodai [the 3rd son of Genghis Khan] attacked Tibet in 1240 in which Reting monastery and Gyal Temple were destroyed, and some 500 monks and civilians were killed[5]. Later, Prince Godan realized that although the Mongols were powerful and strong, they lack the strong moral and spiritual civilization of Tibet. He invited SakyaPanditaKungaGyaltsan [1182-1251], a highly revered Buddhist master of Sakya school of Tibetan Buddhism. In 1247, Godan and SakyaPandita met at Liangzhou, the present day Parig region of Amdo[6]. But this place could be the present day Wuwei city in Gansu province above the Amdo region of Tibet.

SakyaPandita taught Godan starting with the Buddhist concept of refuge-taking, the law of Karma and generating Bodhisattva's mind. The latter was so impressed with the teaching and he made Buddhism the State religion. As Tibet was under his influence at that time, the Prince gave SakyaPandita temporal authority over the thirteen myriarchies [Tib: Khri 'khorbcugsum] of Central Tibet.[7]

In a letter written by SakyaPandita to Tibetans leaders from the Mongol court, he advised everyone to accommodate the Mongol's power and refrain from any violent action which would not be of mutual benefit. In the letter he writes toward the end:

The diverse teachers and powerful figures of China, Tibet, Uighur, Tangut etc. listen to my teachings with great appreciations. They [Mongols] respect me greatly. Have no concerns about how Mongols will treat us here. All may keep these words in mind and stay at peace.[8]
It is clear from the letter that China, Tibet, Uighur, Tangut etc. were distinct entities and SakyaPandita being revered by the people of these countries was advising them out of his concern for everyone.
China has quoted the meeting between the Godan and SakyaPandita and the latter's note to claim Tibet as a part of China. It says:

The meeting is called the 'Liangzhou Talk' in history, after which the 'SakyaPandita's Letter to the Tubo People' was issued, which thus officially incorporated Tibet into Chinese territory and made it an administrative region under the central government of the Yuan Dynasty.[9]
It further says:

The historical event of the Liangzhou Talk is a landmark moment in the history of the development of Tibet-Central Government relations. The Mongolian and Tibetan people have made significant contributions to the peaceful reunification of the motherland and the development of ethic unity.[10]
It is irrational on the part of China's to claim over Tibet on the basis of the aforementioned assertion. Here it is the relationship between Mongol and Tibet, and China is only an outsider who came under Mongol rule in 1279 CE. Kublai Khan declared the establishment of the Yuan Dynasty in 1271, much before it annexed the China's southern Sung Empire. Therefore, China's claim on the Yuan Dynasty does not hold any ground. 

SakyaPandita, passing his religious authority to one of his nephews, Phagpa, died in 1251 in Liangzhou and Prince Godan too died in the same year.

Mongke Khan, the grandson of Genghis khan and the eldest son of Tolui took over. During his reign, the Mongol empire extended greatly in the east and as well as the west and other directions. Kublai Khan, the second son of Tolui, invited Phagpa to his capital Shangdu in Inner Mongolia. Despite the differences at the initial stage, Kublai Khan and his Queen Chabu and many of the Mongolian ministers and officials became devoted Buddhists and Buddhism further gained popularity throughout the regions. Kublai Khan gave Phagpa full authority over the three provinces of Tibet and the Sakya Lamas began to rule Tibet since 1254 CE. It was also recorded that at the request of SakyaPandita Kublai Khan stopped the annual ritual of drowning Chinese to check the Chinese population [Tib: Gya'i me yurchenmo].[11] This was all before Kublai Khan became the Great Khan of Mongolia.

Around13th century, there was northern Jin empire and southern Sung. They were in perpetual fight over the territories. Ogodai, the third son of Genghis Khan conquered Jin empire in 1234, and started campaign to invade the southern Sung empire. It was finally in 1279 that the whole Sung Empire came under the direct rule of Kublai Khan who already has assumed the title of Yuan in 1271 to rule the eastern territories of the Mongol empire and made Beijing its capital.

What was there around that time was: Mongolia, East Turkestan, Tibet, Tangut, Dali, Jin, Sung, Korea, Burma, Vietnam, etc. They all came under the influence of Mongol empire, the Yuan dynasty. Historical map around that period may givebetter picture about what China we are all talking about. [DIIR map-3, The Mongols and Tibet]
There is no denying the fact that Tibet came under Mongol's sphere of influence at different period of its history. But it was a very special relationship of Priest-patron [Tib: Chos-yon] under Godan Khan and Kublai Khan. Mongol did not rule Tibet directly; it was left to the Tibetans only. This all happened before the establishment of Kublai Khan's Yuan dynasty in 1271 CE to rule the Mongol's eastern conquest. Southern Sung of China finally came under Mongol's rule in 1279. This clearly shows that China was only a part of the conquered territories of the Yuan dynasty.

More importantly, Kublai Khan and his successors tried organizing the territories under the Yuan Empire into different provinces. This was finally achieved during the 5th Yuan Emperor Shidebala, Yingzong [r. 1321-1323], in which the Yuan empire was divided into twelve provinces for political and administrative purposes.[12] This map was officially published in China in 1914. It includes all the territories under their direct rules, but we don't find Tibet in it. This goes on to say that Tibet was never considered a part of the Yuan Empire. Therefore, the Chinese assertion is doubly unfounded. [DIIR map-5, the 12 provinces of Yuan Empire]
Lastly, whatever influence that Mongol held on Tibet, it was shelved in 1350 when PhagdruJangchubGyaltsan[r. 1350-1364] took over Tibet from the Sakya's rule and declared Tibetan independence from any Mongol influence. China gained independence from the Mongol only in 1368, i.e. eighteen years later.

Therefore, China's claim that Tibet was a part of China because the Yuan Dynasty is baseless and unfounded. Yuan Dynasty was a Mongol Dynasty under which Tibet, China and many other Asian nations came under its direct and indirect influence.

* This paper was presented during "Mongolia and Tibet Cultural and Religious Symposium" on 6th November, 2019 at Tibet Policy Institute, Dharamsala, India.
      David Morgan, The Mongols, Basil Blackwell Inc., 1987, New York, USA
      Department of Information & International Relations, The Mongols and Tibet, Reprint 2009, Dharamsala, India
      JigmeRigpaiDorje ('Jig med rig pai' rdorje), Horgyichos 'byungbzhugs so, mTsosngo mi rigs dpeskrunkhang, 1993, Tibet
      Kwanten Luc Herman, Tibetan-Mongol Relations During the Yuan Dynasty (1207-1368),Ph.D thesis, University of South Carolina, 1972, USA
      ShakabpaTsepon W.D., Tibet A Political History, Potala Publications, 1984, New York, USA
      The Liangzhou Talk between Godan and SakyaPandita http://eng.tibet.cn/eng/index/Archives/201907/t20190712_6635163.html

[1]David Morgan, The Mongols, p-56
[2] Also known by the Western Xia or Xi Xia, it was known by Tibetan as Mi-nyak
[3] DIIR, The Mongols and Tibet, p-2, 2nd edition, 2009
[4]Kwanten Luc Herman, Tibetan-Mongol Relations during the Yuan dynasty, p-50, p-52, p-57, Phd thesis, 1972
[5]Shakabpa, Tibet a Political History, p-61
[6] DIIR, The Mongols and Tibet, p-11. But Shakabpa says it is Lan-chou, the capital city of Kansu, p-63
[7]Shakabpa, p-63
[8] DIIR, The Mongols and Tibet, p-14
[9] The Liangzhou Talk between Godan and SakyaPandita, http://eng.tibet.cn/eng/index/Archives/201907/t20190712_6635163.html
[10] ibid
[11]Shakabpa, p-65
[12] DIIR, The Mongols and Tibet, p-21